Wayne, I don't think you would go wrong with the Tamron nor with the
Tokina/2.5 Macro. I have the latter and love it. Albert speaks very highly
of his as well.
Charlie Geilfuss
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne Culberson [mailto:waynecul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 3:08 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Zuiko 90/2 vs. Tamron 90/2.8
>When I came into possession of a NIB 90/2 Zuiko macro a few weeks
>ago, I promised to do some comparison test shots with it and the
>90/2.8 Tamron macro.
>(3) Neither lens is distinguishable from the other in terms of
>sharpness and/or contrast. I see absolutely no difference in
>either area. And I looked hard!
>(4The bottom line is that both lenses
>produce really fuzzy and smooth bokeh, about as good as it gets.
>Walt
Thanks for the comparison. Sound maybe like a 90mm might be my first Tamron.
Time to start looking I guess.
Wayne
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|