Subject: | RE: [OM] ISPs. html (was WTT: My long one for your short one) |
---|---|
From: | "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:25:12 -0700 |
That word 'if' is an enormous one in this context. Quality Control would be rendered useless in a perfect world. I know that where I work, we're not quite 'perfect' yet... >-----Original Message----- >From: John A. Lind >Subject: Re: [OM] ISPs. html (was WTT: My long one for your short one) > If it's done correctly at the outset, inspection and containment is unnecessary. > >-- John < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] ISPs. html (was WTT: My long one for your short one), John A. Lind |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Hazards of short lenses, Stephen Troy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] ISPs. html (was WTT: My long one for your short one), Garry D. Lewis |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Hazards of short lenses, Stephen Troy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |