Read Gary's multiple tests of this lens
<http://members.aol.com/olympusom/lenstests/default.htm> with different
camera and support combinations. I think he makes it very clear that the
lens itself is very good and can give bad results with certain
camera/support combinations. This is just the kind of situation where
some will write about how good their lens is and others about how bad
the same lens is.
Moose
At 10:38 PM 5/14/2003 +0200, Wim Verheyen wrote:
I am currently looking for an affordable tele or tele-zoom. Range
should be min. 200mm with decent aperture (f4 or less). I have not
heard many good comments about the Zuiko 200/4.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|