At 10:38 PM 5/14/2003 +0200, Wim Verheyen wrote:
Hello all,
I am currently looking for an affordable tele or tele-zoom.
Range should be min. 200mm with decent aperture (f4 or less).
I have not heard many good comments about the Zuiko 200/4.
[snip]
I'm not sure I understand why the 200/4.0 Zuiko has such a mediocre
reputation. I too have heard these comments, and they bemuse me. Here's
some shots I took with the 200/4.0:
http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/wood/karen01.html
http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/wood/elk.html
http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/wood/rockwash.html
http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/wood/pinnacle.html
Would someone please tell me what's wrong with these photos from a "lens
quality" standpoint? I certainly can't detect any problems...
Garth
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|