Garth...You did the 200/4.0 proud...We were in the same area about 2 years
ago...Spectacular scenery...Marty
----- Original Message -----
From: "Garth Wood" <garth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] 200 f4 or better tele or zoom
> At 10:38 PM 5/14/2003 +0200, Wim Verheyen wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >
> >I am currently looking for an affordable tele or tele-zoom.
> >Range should be min. 200mm with decent aperture (f4 or less).
> >I have not heard many good comments about the Zuiko 200/4.
>
>
> [snip]
>
> I'm not sure I understand why the 200/4.0 Zuiko has such a mediocre
> reputation. I too have heard these comments, and they bemuse me. Here's
> some shots I took with the 200/4.0:
>
>
> http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/wood/karen01.html
> http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/wood/elk.html
> http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/wood/rockwash.html
> http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/wood/pinnacle.html
>
>
> Would someone please tell me what's wrong with these photos from a "lens
> quality" standpoint? I certainly can't detect any problems...
>
>
> Garth
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|