> > Is it possible that the part numbers changed at some point, leading him
to
> > believe that the two are different just because of the relative age of
the
> > drawings, or is there a part number "including foam" for the OM1? Or is
it
> > just that he didn't want to do the job (most likely, I guess)?
>
> Early OM-1's and M-1's had the part number as LC4073 instead of LC4086.
> It's the same part as far as I know and they're interchangeable. Perhaps
> that's what lead him to believe that they're different.
> -mark
>
I had a OM1 which I later sold, but it was an early model which did not have
the MD symbol. I put a prism from a parts OMG in it, and it fit perfectly.
Wayne
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|