On Sat, 26 Apr 2003, Julian Davies wrote:
> Is it possible that the part numbers changed at some point, leading him to
> believe that the two are different just because of the relative age of the
> drawings, or is there a part number "including foam" for the OM1? Or is it
> just that he didn't want to do the job (most likely, I guess)?
Early OM-1's and M-1's had the part number as LC4073 instead of LC4086.
It's the same part as far as I know and they're interchangeable. Perhaps
that's what lead him to believe that they're different.
-mark
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|