Subject: | Re: [OM] om-1 versus om-3 |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 05 Apr 2003 19:08:44 -0800 |
Could be. Maybe you should run some tests and let us all know :-) . We
could award you the Gary Reese Award. While you are at it, check out MLU
vs. none please.
Giles wrote: My guess is that the vibration absorptive capacity of hands holding the camera would far exceed the vibration from the aperture stop-down mechanism. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 35-80mm f2.8 BIN $875, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OT - to lie or to lay, Mickey Trageser |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] om-1 versus om-3, Giles |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] om-1 versus om-3, Giles |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |