Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] -3Ti - was: om-1 versus om-3

Subject: Re: [OM] -3Ti - was: om-1 versus om-3
From: "Clemente Colayco" <litefoot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:29:32 +0800
"whine and "dine" the CDFO, she may just sign the approval of the PO....

----- Original Message -----
From: "John and Julie Ockman" <jrockman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] -3Ti - was: om-1 versus om-3


>
>
> Moose wrote:
> >
> > gries wrote:
> >
> > >some enlightenment please from those who have used and love the
allusive -3Ti.
> > >
> > And I thought they were only ellusive. Now they have reached such mythic
> > status that they are the subject of metaphoric allusion? ;-)
> >
> > Moose
> >
> I do not know about anybody else, but I find them damn "elusive", and
> damn expensive when I do catch up with one. I know a certain Mark has an
> OM4T Black New In Box I might blow all my OM money on because I can not
> justify the expense of the -3Ti, no matter how much I whine at the CDFO.
> John
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz