Subject: | Re: [OM] -3Ti - was: om-1 versus om-3 |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 04 Apr 2003 17:48:45 -0800 |
gries wrote: And I thought they were only ellusive. Now they have reached such mythic status that they are the subject of metaphoric allusion? ;-)some enlightenment please from those who have used and love the allusive -3Ti. Moose < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Way OT, delete now if you want, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Sigma 400/5.6 + Oly 1.4TC?, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] -3Ti - was: om-1 versus om-3, gries |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] -3Ti - was: om-1 versus om-3, John and Julie Ockman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |