---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 09:43:36 -0500
I blame having had only one cup of coffee. I'm not awake enough
to read well. It's the 28-105/2.8 Tamron I've got. How much
smaller is the 35-105/2.8? Maybe adding those genes to the pool
would be beneficial.
Walt
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 09:38:32 -0500
>Congrats on the Tamron. I've got both these lenses and have been
>trying to breed them. Imagne progeny the size of the Zuiko but
>with the reach of the Tamron and the performance of either.
>
>Walt
>
>---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
>From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 23:40:51 -0800
>
>>The Zuikoholic in me says yes.
>>The photographer in me says no, the Tamron 35-105/2.8 is already
>>here and a great lens.
>>Somebody please buy it!
>>
>>Moose
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|