I was wrong on two counts:
It's grizzly33bear, not grizzly66bear
I thought the Peleng was an Arsenal product. It's not, it's from Belomo in
Minsk, Belarus.
But may still be worth asking...
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Piers Hemy
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 7:50 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [OM] Russian 8 and 16mm Fisheyes for OM?
Tim
Last year I ordered a Peleng 16mm from a dealer in London, who advertised
them as being in T-mount. After a couple of days the dealer called me to
back out of the deal, as he could not get the lens to foucs to infinity when
on an OM T-mount, and could see no way to reduce the thickness of the mount
to permit infinity focus because of the bayoner-release mechanism. This
tells me that although the mount may be M42x0.75 (the same as on a T-mount),
the register is not the same as on a T-mount. Which was a pity, but I am
very grateful to the dealer for 'fessing up at the outset. I have seen
other super-wides (maybe the Zenitar) with three screws into the face of the
lens mount which at first sight might be a more straightforward job for a
homebrew mount-swap (a surplus extension tube, maybe?) but you still have
the problem of the bayonet release button(and it is mounted on the extension
tube, not the flange).
If you want to search on a well-known auction site, try seller grizzly66bear
who can get OM mount lenses. I don't remember seeing her offer any Peleng
lenses, but she clearly has an "in" at the Arsenal factory, and could
probably get one adapted as they claim to have NC-controlled machine tools
for the mount manufacture.
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Hughes
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 4:26 AM
To: Olympus List
Subject: [OM] Russian 8 and 16mm Fisheyes for OM?
Hi Zuiks,
the Russian made preset 8mm and 16mm lenses are available new
for very attractive prices. (16mm ~$105 incl shipping, onEbay, and the 8mm
~$200 on net) Prices depend a bit on mount supplied with default being
Pentax M42. see for example:
http://www.stores.ebay.com/moscowgifts4u/plistings/list/auction/dept5/index.
html
net prices are a bit more: http://www.geocities.com/belshop/content9.html
It appears people find the performance reasonable see:
http://medfmt.8k.com/third/kievwide.html
Writing to the one seller he says that he does not have an OM adapter for
these lenses. Looking at the photographs of the lenses it appears that the
adpater for M42 is similar to a T mount with three radial screws. The other
adapters fit onto the M42 adpaters in some cases, and in others (eg the
Nikon) it is another adapter something like a Tmount. Since the lenses works
with Pentax (~45.6mm register distance) and Nikon (~46.6mm register) it
should be possible to adapt them to work with OM (46mm register). The rear
lens element does go fairly far back beyond flange, so potentially there
could be mirror interference on OM's large mirror, but it looks like it
should work. I already have an OM 16mm which I really like, but would be
interested in the 8mm. I have adapted other preset lenses previously to OM
so this looks quite an attractive proposition compared with the $1200, 8mm
OM. Does anybody have any experience with one of these lenses eg. in Leica
screw? I would be particularly interested in dimensions of the raw lens
"mount" with flange adapter removed. Also is the raw mount a smooth or does
it have a screw like a TMount? Regards, Tim Hughes TimHughes@xxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|