I think that it only really works with longer focal lengths at full
aperture; with the iS3000 the instructions are to only use it with the zoom
set to 180mm, as shorter focal lengths can lead to vignetting. It probably
works with a 135/2.8, but a better match would be the 200mm f4.
Roger Key
Titow wrote:
Wait, as I recall list members discussed that the B 300 does lead to light
loss somehow.
----- Original Message -----
From: <petertje@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 4:14 PM
Subject: [OM] My hunt for long, fast glass
>
> Hi,
>
> In the end I settled for an Olympus IS B-300 front convertor. I won a
bid
for one at 142 Euro on eBay last week. Even though I've never used
anything
like it, I liked the reviews it gets all over Internet. And a 150/f2.x
sounds cooooool :-)
>
> Obviously, my hunt for Zuiko glass has triggered a bad attack of
Zuikoholism again. Maybe I should get that 135/2.8 anyway, it would work
fine with the B-300. And an F280 has been on my list for a long time (I
have no flash). And of course, that 24mm shift that I've been drooling on
for a decade now. But I think I'll have eBay block my account before I do
anything stupid :-)
>
> Next up is a trip to Ireland where I can test it all out. I'll grab 2
bodies: one loaded with a film I want to test (probably Velvia and Provia
100F), and the other with SensiaII, which I love already. After that, I'm
ready for my loooong 2 month overland trip to Japan :-) I'm still
considering what OM stuff to take, and whether to take my P&S as well. The
stories about robbery on trains make me a bit worried...
>
> Thanks for all the info you mailed, particularly Frank van Lindert who
more or less acted as a guide through the billions of OM options available.
Who says it's a dead system when there's thousands of very active users ?
>
>
> Peter.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|