| Subject: | Re: [OM] Name vs. performance |
|---|---|
| From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:07:06 -0800 |
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 04:22 PM, Moose wrote: Winsor, the 90/2 and 85/2 are worlds apart in size and weight. Dan, I wouldn't. Moose No one ever accused me of precision. I meant the 80/4, as a macro. I have the 85 which is a fine lens. Winsor Crosby Long Beach, California, USA < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] ( OM ) Possible TOPE topic, Wayne Culberson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Name vs. performance, C.H.Ling |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Name vs. performance, Richard F. Man |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Name vs. performance, Larry |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |