At 01:32 PM 2/4/2003 -1000, danrich wrote:
Tell me why you would buy a $800 90mm Zuiko macro over a less than half the
cost Tamron 90mm 2.8 Macro the out performs the Zuiko 4.3 vs. 4.2 ?
Are we nuts or are we getting into logo's or collection?
...
First of all, a single # cannot represent all that is about a lens. There
are many different characteristics to consider. For example, the 90/2 bokeh
is supposed to be just oh so creamy (and it is). However, when you come
right down to it, there is no way the Zuiko can be 4x or 5x BETTER, may be
slightly better, or even slightly worse. So yes, it's a Zuikoholic thing.
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com>
<http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo>
On-line orders, support, and listservers available on web site.
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|