On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 17:29:30 -0500
"Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Oh this is an easy one.
>
> 90/2
>
> Hands down. Great telephoto. Amazing Macro.
>
> And the bokeh is so smooooooooooooooooooooth.
>
Hey, not fair! You and George keep listing lenses that I don't have,
never tried and cannot justify (35-80/2.8, 90/2, 180/2, 350/2.8,...)!
Not fair atall..:(
--thomas
> Tom
>
> > Thomas wrote:
> >
> > Here is an interresting question, George (and others): imagine
> > that you could keep only ONE lens, and that it had to be a PRIME
> > (i.e. no zooms). What would that lens be?
> >
> > For me, I would pick either the 55/1.2 or the 135/2,8 - with a
> > strong preference for the 55/1.2. The 55/1.2 is truely amazing,
> > and I use that probably more than any other lens I ever owned
> > (for the OMs, that is).
> >
> > --thomas
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
--
-------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
-------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|