On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 12:20:26 -0800
"R. Jackson" <jackson.robert.r@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I guess I haven't been able to get past the new-lens phase of mine.
>
> Over the last month it's only been off my camera two or three times
> and that was so I could use my Tamron 17mm f3.5 for warped
> perspective stuff that it wouldn't do. Most of the time it seems
> like the Swiss Army Knife of lenses, though. Always bright through
> the viewfinder, a focal length ideal for most everything I want to
> shoot and not *too* bulky, though it is a little on the large side.
>
> -Rob
Geee, I really have to get nearby a listee who has a 35-80/2.8 that I
can try. I have only seen one once, through a window in a Japanese
camera shop which wanted what seemed to me to be infinitely many yen
for it.
Giles promised I could try his next time I went to Ireland.....maybe
time to start planning the next summer vacation :)
--thomas
>
> On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 07:16 AM, Walt Wayman wrote:
>
> > I agree with Tom about the 35-80/2.8. Mine often stays at home,
> > too.
> >
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
--
-------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
-------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|