Moose, we've now established that I am younger than you. Thus, you
just made my day - thanks :)
That said, I had OM's for a long time, until the local N*kon
distributor wanted to "lend" me an F5 (as in: we will refund fully
within 3 months, if you do not like it). I tried....and realized that
to use it I would need bigger biceps :) Then it went back, much to
the surprise of the N*kon pusher - who (to his credit) did refund me
fully for the body and the lenses (some nice glass, I have to say) I
returned.
Anyways, thanks for making me feel less old ;)
--thomas
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:49:51 -0800
Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Goodness, an F5 is "way back"? I'm talking Nik*n F. Back then,
> Nik*n 'was' the world for serious SLRs.
>
> Moose
>
> Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
>
> >I also used Nikon way back....(an F5, when they came out). Never
> >really noticed that they were different. I have a Pentax MZ-S as
> >well, and I had to think....they are mounting lenses the same way
> >as the OM.
> >
> >Perhaps it is Nikon doing things differently from the rest of the
> >world?
> >
> >
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
--
-------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
-------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|