Subject: | Re: [OM] Maitani's one design flaw |
---|---|
From: | Pschings@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:45:19 EST |
In a message dated 1/16/2003 12:42:38 PM Eastern Standard Time, gries@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: Wouldn't it be nice if the aperture ring went the other way? That is, that it would spin the same direction as the SS ring. I wonder why he did that. Wouldn't the other way be backwards? The way it is now if I turn both rings the same direction and the same number of "clicks" I get equivalent exposure. Elegant and simple. Paul Schings |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] Photographing political demonstrations: advice please, Timpe, Jim |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] contrast filters in b & w photography, Roger Wesson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Maitani's one design flaw, Jim Brokaw |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Maitani's one design flaw, Wayne Harridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |