Both file is non compressed. Even compress, my PC do it in 7 seconds for a
60MB file with Photoshop LE.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tal Lancaster" <tal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> On 1 Jan 2003 16:09:58 -0000
> owner-olympus-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (olympus-digest) wrote:
>
> I thought of another thing regarding these time tests. With the vuescan
> time tests, are the TIFFs compressed or not? Nikonscan doesn't compress
> the TIFF file, so maybe some of time for vuescan is the compute time for
> compressing the file before it writes?
>
>
> >
> > Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 11:36:08 +0800
> > From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [OM] Re: Vuescan, an HP S20, and me
> >
> > I don't have the LS2000 anymore, just test the LS4000, ignore auto
> > focus and auto exposure timing, with a 2.4GHz PC and 768MB RAM Window
> > ME. No ICE and filters. auto crop in vuescan, similar cropping in
> > Nikon SW.
> >
> > Vuescan - 61 seconds for scan, 29 seconds for saving the cropped file.
> > Nikon original software, color management off - 51 seconds total.
> >
> > ICE on
> >
> > Vuescan - 70 seconds for scan, 50 seconds for saving the crop.
> > Nikon original software, color management off - 81 seconds total.
> >
> > The crop file saving time in Vuescan is depends on the CPU speed, it
> > was very slow when I was running a 500MHz AMD (one year ago) and 256MB
> > RAM. It probably took four times in the post saving time.
> >
> > C.H.Ling
> >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|