Subject: | Re: [OM] 50mm f2 vs 3.5 |
---|---|
From: | "Tim Chakravorty" <suchismit@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 17 Nov 2002 18:00:26 -0800 |
Not to forget that Nikon also made lenses for Canon cameras , before Canon started making their own lenses. -Tim > It is said that Nikon got itself on the map originally by producing > lenses for Leica rangefinders that were sharper and much cheaper than > the German variety and selling them to news photographers. > -- > Winsor Crosby > Long Beach, California > > > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Winsor Crosby |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Tim Chakravorty |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Winsor Crosby |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 50mm f2 vs 3.5, John Hudson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |