>The issue is Olympus's careless abuse of language. When they
>said they would continue to provide service for ten years,
>they were referring only to products that are officially in
>production at the time the OM system is discontinued.
> snip
Well put.
>The OM cameras were a conscious effort to create an SLR Leica.
>You'd think Olympus would have adopted Leica's policy (at that
>time) of servicing almost everything they ever made.
I think Winsor had a good insight into this, with his comment
that Olympus is a disposable products company. Olympus simply
does not understand the long-term committment needed to be a
Leica clone company.
Pete
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|