On Sat, 12 Oct 2002 10:00:49 -0300
"Wayne Culberson" <waynecul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I've seen on Gary's lens-test site where he has used the OM2000
> > quite a
> bit.
> >
> > Yet in the last digest somebody noted that it is a despised
> > camera. Is
> this
> > because it is a C*s*n* product, or are there deeper reasons?.
> >
> > This curious person wants to know. Brian
>
>
<SNIP>
> No, the
> OM2000 is not for profesionals. But one thing I've learned from
> reading this list for well over a year now, every OM camera model
> breaks, wears out, short circuits, or needs repair from time to
> time. Well, maybe not the OM3ti.
I am wondering, how repairable is the OM2000 in the hands of the
pros, compared to e.g. the OM1? I would assume that there might be
more unrepairable things that could fail in an OM2000 than in an OM1.
Thinking about the unavailability of the circuit for OM2s/p's
rendering a dead OM2s/p into a doorstop, is the same not likely for
the OM2000?
Clint and John, ever opened an OM2000?
<SNIP>
--
-------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
-------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|