Subject: | RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2? |
---|---|
From: | "Robert Gries" <rgg@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:29:34 -0500 |
but an f4 aperture? that's almost pinhole! ;) <snip> And for those of us who are too compulsive to make a decision, how about the Zuiko 28-48mm f4 zoom. This assumes you don't have a collection of all the Zuikos and a body for each. Seriously, this lens is fairly light and small and is a nice range for a limited kit. Bill Barber < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Deutscher Motor Sport Bund, Tom Scales |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Deutscher Motor Sport Bund, Robert Gries |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, NSURIT |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Timpe, Jim |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |