Subject: | RE: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2? |
---|---|
From: | "Robert Gries" <rgg@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:55:44 -0500 |
Give up Velvia!?! Never! Anyway, my most used film is K64. I love that extra 1/3 stop... ;) <snip> If you could break off the relationship you have with Velvia and use something a couple of stops faster, you'd be back in the game. We are talking limited kit, so I might put up with the slower zoom and carry a 50mm f1.4 for those very few cases that only the very fastest will do (fastest I own, that is). Bill Barber < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, NSURIT |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Question on 20/2 and 38/2.8 macro lenses, Daan Kalmeijer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, NSURIT |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |