Subject: | RE: [OM] shades |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 30 Jun 2002 23:09:38 -0700 |
> Bill Pearce [mailto:bspearce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:Yup, and saves plastic, too! To be ideally effective, shade should be rectangular, to match the frame.Actually, along Bill's line, I have read somewhere (another internet list?) that rectangular is indeed the perfect shape for a lens hood (on a prime?), but that they aren't made that way as they then don't reverse real well onto the lens for easy storage. This could be totally wrong...but I can't imagine something I read from the internet being inaccurage <vbg> Cheers Marc Sydney, Oz You then need to redesign the end of the lens barrel so that the rectangular shade only goes onto it in the correct position matching the rectangular film format. Then things can get real fiddly attaching and detaching unless the design is brilliant. -- Winsor Crosby Long Beach, California ? < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LPs still chugging, was Re: [OM] Re: OT ( OM ) CDROMs, Jim L'Hommedieu |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] shades, Winsor Crosby |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] shades, Marc Lawrence |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] shades, Marc Lawrence |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |