Like in anything, some can afford to be really free with money, and not even
expect too much...
Larry
"C.H.Ling" wrote:
> IMO price and value of a lens is not calculated in that way. I'm
> willing to pay four times the price for a lens that is 30% better in
> resolution, 30 0.000000e+00ss in distortion, 30% more accurate color
> reproduction...
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> Jim Brokaw wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > The Olympus 18/3.5 is a very good lens, but very very expensive. I think 130
> > Euro (or the slightly higher $130) would be a good price for the Tamron
> > 17.3.5 lens... They seen to typically go on e*ay for that much or more. I
> > think the Olympus 18/3.5 would cost four or five times as much, and I don't
> > think it can be four or five times as good...
> > --
> >
> > Jim Brokaw
> > OM-1's, -2's, -4's, (no -3's yet) and no OM-oney...
> >
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|