ML Archiv: Re: Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5

Olympus-OM

Re: Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5

from Wayne Harridge

Subject:	Re: Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5
From:	Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 17 Jun 2002 11:05:37 +1000




> Brian Swale <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> excellent. Linear distortion noticeable in some subjects,  but
> present in 
> average amounts.
> 

Aren't these highly objective "measurements" great !


Wayne Harridge

http://members.optusnet.com.au/~w_harridge

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, Wim Verheyen Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, Jim Brokaw Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, Larry Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, C.H.Ling [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, Walt Wayman Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, Brian Swale Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, Wim Verheyen Re: Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, Wayne Harridge <= Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, Wim Verheyen Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, Roger D. Key Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, Walt Wayman Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, Roger D. Key

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] WTB: Bellows/ focusing rail/stage or trade for some of my goodies., Clemente Colayco
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] My camera was fixed for $4, Charles Sdunek
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, Wim Verheyen
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] TAMRON 17 / 3,5, Wim Verheyen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]