Subject: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 200/5 ? |
---|---|
From: | "Paul Farrar" <farrar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 7 Jun 2002 14:32:27 -0500 (CDT) |
Bill Stanke wrote: > > Winsor: > > I think that you observation is correct. I think the F/5 was a > marketing ploy that "most lenses from 28(?) to 200 used the 49 mm > filter. Didn't the announced (and shown in promotional literature), but never delivered, 300/6.3 use 49mm filters? Paul < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: Zuiko 200 f5, dreammoose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: Zuiko 200 f5, AG Schnozz |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 200/5 ?, CyberSimian |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 200/5 ?, GFaulk7376 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |