Wow thanks...but your percentage comparisons seem to be
splitting hairs.....yes!! an 180/2.8 dream:-).. my
shallow pockets are an issue.
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 21:36:45 -0500
"Gary Edwards" <garyetx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Only 75% as much mass, 83% as long, and uses 49 mm
filters;
if speed matters, get the 180/2.8!
But, as always, your choice depends on what matters most
to you, and your
pocketbook.
Gary
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page:
http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|