RE: [OM] Which s/n of the 55/1.2 is radioactive?

[Daniel J. Mitchell]

> You mean that you do not have the 400/4? I know they were in short
> production at the Wyomig plant, and were sold packaged with 
> the 1000/1.8 (which also takes 55mm filters), but I thought you, of all
people...:)

 Then there's the imposing-sounding 17-35/1.0 Can*n lens..

 http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0206/feature2/zoom1.html

 -- dan

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >