Tom,
You mean that you do not have the 400/4? I know they were in short
production at the Wyomig plant, and were sold packaged with the 1000/1.8
(which also takes 55mm filters), but I thought you, of all people...:)
What I meant was, of course, the 200/4..... :)
Unfortunately, I'd never tried anything longer than 300mm yet....:)
--thomas
ps: Tom, the checque should be in the mail.....
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Tom Scales wrote:
> Now THAT is a lens I'd like to see. Not only is it an f/4, it takes 55mm
> filters!
>
> Tom
>
>
> From: <T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> <snip>
> and 400/4, which
> all take 55mm threads.
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
--
-------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
-------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|