Subject: | Re: [OM] Which s/n of the 55/1.2 is radioactive? |
---|---|
From: | dreammoose <dreammoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 03 Jun 2002 19:46:53 -0700 |
If you need any more reasons, it's also longer, fatter, 310g vs. the
230g of the 1.4, uses 55mm filters and needs a different hood. Oh, and
only half a stop faster than the 1.4.
Moose Tom Scales wrote: It is a fine lens, but if you already have a 50/1.4, I'd pass. There are other things to add to your Zuinventory first. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] published OM/Zuiko shot, Gary Edwards |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Getty Photo Exhibit, Gary Edwards |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Which s/n of the 55/1.2 is radioactive?, Tom Scales |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Which s/n of the 55/1.2 is radioactive?, Mark Marr-Lyon |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |