Hi
No it is really a 24 f2.0 yes 2.0 , I found that it
may have been made by Kiron and that it quiet rare ,
It is taking 55mm filter size but I saw on Ebay
Vivitar 24mm F2.0 with 52mm filter size, Now this is
getting a bit complicated as I can't find info on the
diffrent between this two. Any one know?
Dan
--- "Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas"
<cjss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I had a Tamron 24/2.5,
and I didn't like it. It was
> very soft wide open,
> had poor sharpness at the smallest apertures (say,
> f/16) and was extremely
> flare-prone -- though in the viewfinder it hardly
> showed any ghosting!
> However, in the middle range of apertures (around
> 5.6-8) it rendered nice
> pictures.
>
> I have no experience with the Vivitar, but I don't
> recall a 24/2.0. Maybe
> it's the 24/2.8? I believe that was a very
> affordable lens, so perhaps is
> not a stellar performer. However, at GBP 43 it
> should be a better value
> than the Tamron. Your mileage may vary, anyway.
>
> ------------------
>
> Carlos Santisteban
>
> <cjss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <cjsantis@xxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing
> List >
> < For questions,
> mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page:
> http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|