Tris Schuler wrote:
>
> There may well be precedent for this, and not too long ago there was a
> thread on Photonet which claimed (second hand) that "someone" had "said" he
> had information that the Fujipress emulsions (or at least the 800 stuff)
> were the same as regular Superia emulsions only taken from the "middle" of
> the runs.
No surprise, I also heard the same here, their description and purpose
are nothing special. Just like the RA (Sensia II) and RAP (Astia) I
believe they are the same. But when one claim portrait film and the
other claim general purpose, a bit harder to believe.
C.H.Ling
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|