Sorry George. I did take the comment too far.
I usually use a tripod also because I don't know what shutter speed I may be
using before the photo.
The places I've lugged that heavy thing make me think I'm just a masochist.
And then I leave it at home and kick myself (which is quite an interesting
concept if you think about it).
I never used to use one, then I bought a good one. And then I saw my photos
improve - as you point out not only from camera shake.
Foxy
----- Original Message -----
If you agree that it may not offer a reduction in shake, then you don't
disagree! Maybe you took my 'no advantage to using a tripod' comment too
far, I was only answering the camera shake issue, because that was the only
question asked.
George S.
foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> I would disagree. I always use a tripod. Although it may not offer any
> reduction in shake, it does force me to compose better. The only hand held
> shots I do are flash macros.
>
> And I always lock up the mirror, even at 1/1000. A creature of habit.
>
> Foxy
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|