Subject: | Re: [OM] Re: mc vs sc again (as related to 200/f4) |
---|---|
From: | Henrik Dahl <hdahl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:45:47 +0100 |
> Well, since I got no answers I assume this has been discussed? Anyone > point me to the archive? Thanks > > Corey. Try: http://brashear.phys.appstate.edu/lhawkins/photo/mc-sc.survey There are some obvious faults in the list (no, not the OM-list ;-)), but it gives you a hint on around what serials MC line starts. Henrik Dahl < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] OM-1N, metering way off, Daniel J. Mitchell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] reflectors, Acer/Siddiq |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: mc vs sc again (as related to 200/f4), Conrad Vogel |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: mc vs sc again (as related to 200/f4), frieder . faig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |