Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re: mc vs sc again (as related to 200/f4)

Subject: Re: [OM] Re: mc vs sc again (as related to 200/f4)
From: frieder.faig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:50:14 +0100
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 07:56:07AM -0800, Conrad Vogel wrote:
> Well, since I got no answers I assume this has been discussed?  Anyone 
> point me to the archive?  Thanks
> 
> Corey.
> 
> Conrad Vogel wrote:
> 
> > referring to 
> > http://zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/archives/1999/msg20098.html in the 
> > archives, I am curious about the comment:
> >
> > "On the book " THE WORLD OF OM SYSTEM", of our common friend Franz
> > Pangerl appears as first generation and multi-coated lenses:
> >
> > 18mm f3.5 L Zuiko Auto-W
> > 24mm f 2   J Zuiko Auto-W
> > 28mm f 2   I Zuiko Auto-W
> > 35mm f 2   H Zuiko Auto-W
> > 135mm f 2.8 E Zuiko Auto-T
> > 200mm f 4    E Zuiko Auto-T"
> >
> > I was wondering if the 200/f4 sivernose started out as a MC lens. 
> > Sorry for the goofy question, but was curious as to this statement.


I´ve had a lock in my book. I have the 3th edition. It gives the same info 
for  MC-lenses. But this edition is based on 1978 lens data. So there is no 
info about how the lenses started. 

Frieder



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz