I have found a 24mm, and I am wondering if "wider is better"... Because of
the price of the Tokina 28mm, I might just buy it to keep it, not a lot of
money.. For a few $$$ more, I can get a 24mm, and I'm just afraid that the
24mm will give me the same ho-hum performance the 28mm did...
Great pics! WOW.. Mine from my Zuiko 28mm don't look anything close to
that. Having the Tokina 90mm/f2.5 macro, which is by far my sharpest lens,
I am a Tokina fan... Yeah, might just get one.
Albert
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Wesson" <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Zuiko 24mm/2.8 vs 28mm/2.8
> Try the Tokina 28/2.8. At the risk of sounding like a Tokina
> evangelist, I'll say what I've said before - I've been very pleased with
> the performance of my example, and it is by far my most used lens. I
> paid 35 pounds for it - roughly $50 - but I suspect that it could be had
> for less. See www.worldtraveller.f9.co.uk/photo for some examples of
> what I've taken with it. I find that when I visualise a photo, the 28mm
> generally gives me the field of view and perspective I want.
>
> I crave something wider, at least 24mm and probably 21mm, but I like the
> 28mm view a lot.
>
> Roger
>
> Olympus wrote:
> >
> > I am very unhappy with my 28mm/2.8, I have found a decent priced
24mm/2.8.
> > I was wondering if anybody had both lenses, and if the 24mm was a bit
> > sharper vs. the 28mm, or about the same? If that's the case, then I
will
> > want to go outside the Zuiko family for my wide angle lens..
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Albert
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|