Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36

Subject: Re: [OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36
From: "Mickey Trageser" <mickeytr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:06:03 -0500
OK Scott. So now you're going to tell us you remember when you had to spread
a protective coating on Polaroid pictures, and they were black and white!
(oops, I remember....)
-Mickey
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Gomez" <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:39 PM
Subject: RE: [OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36


> I'm too young?! That's the first time someone's told me that in at least
10
> years. :-)
>
> I used to shoot 20 exp. rolls. It is just so long ago now that I wasn't
sure
> I remembered correctly.
>
> ---
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sue Pearce [mailto:bspearce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Subject: [OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36
>
> First, to Scott, youy brain is ok, you're just too young. Of course, film
> was once 20 and 36. Then, one company added 4 exposures, "at no extra
cost"
> and then everyone did.
>
> <snip>
>
> Bill Pearce
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz