Subject: | Re: [OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36 |
---|---|
From: | dreammoose <dreammoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 02 Jan 2002 21:21:41 -0800 |
Still do for the 3000asa B&W stuff. Moose Mickey Trageser wrote: OK Scott. So now you're going to tell us you remember when you had to spread a protective coating on Polaroid pictures, and they were black and white! (oops, I remember....) < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] totally OT !#@$! X10 wireless vidoecrap whatever, dreammoose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36, Tom Scales |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36, Mickey Trageser |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 24 (or 20) vs. 36, Tom Scales |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |