Oh :-) Never mind then!
Anyway, that's a good assessment. I tried the Tamron 28-105 once in a
camera store but thought the lens is way too big and heavy for the OM.
Then again, isn't the 35-80 suppose to be pretty big too?
At 11:15 PM 1/2/2002 -0500, you wrote:
No, no, no! You've got it backwards. I had to fork over the cash and my
Tamron 28-105 to get the Zuiko 35-80.
I only wished that I'd been able to do the reverse deal. ;-)
Skip
From: "Richard F. Man" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Tamron 28-105 f2.8
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 16:14:27 -0800
Wow, you got the 35-8- AND cash for it? That's pretty good. You can get a
Tamron 28-105 new for $800 but the 35-80 runs $1100!
At 08:47 AM 1/2/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Adi,
...
I traded it for a Zuiko 35-80/2.8 + some cash.
Skip
...
// richard http://www.imagecraft.com
[ For technical support, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]
...
// richard http://www.imagecraft.com
[ For technical support, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|