Subject: | RE: [OM] 24 vs 36 exposure debate |
---|---|
From: | "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 2 Jan 2002 20:25:25 +1100 |
Thomas wrote: > > That's nine bodies - then come infrared.... > > I'd say that 10 bodies are a bare minimum....of course, they have to come > with Winder2/Motordrive2's and the inevitable 24/2+85/2 combo too ;) > > How would you be a true zuikoholic otherwise? ;) > And what about backup bodies ? ...Wayne < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Wonderbricks R Us, Thomas Heide Clausen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] solstice picture, Richard F. Man |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 24 vs 36 exposure debate, Thomas Heide Clausen |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] 24 vs 36 exposure debate, Thomas Heide Clausen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |