Subject: | RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5? |
---|---|
From: | "Daniel J. Mitchell" <DanielMitchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 14 Dec 2001 17:56:02 -0700 |
> : Is it the same sort of thing as this? > : http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1308886972 > > > Must be the same. Look here for the Exakta: > http://www.fotoinfo.sk/s_objektivy_zrk_exakta_pop.htm Ah, thanks. I'm still occasionally tempted by these, but that's still a fair amount of money for a lens I'd almost certainly hardly ever use. -- dan < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Hans van Veluwen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Flash techniques for total beginners?, John A. Lind |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, James N. McBride |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] Lens Advise needed, Matteson, David |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |