ML Archiv: Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?

Subject:	Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?
From:	"Bruce Hamm" <bhamm@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 14 Dec 2001 21:13:48 -0500

> My lens I call "the beast" is a 650-1300mm zoom made by Exacta with an OM
> mount.

James,

How do you find the optical quality of the lens. What do you typically use
this for?

Bruce


Bruce Hamm
Ottawa, Canada
bhamm@xxxxxxxx



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, (continued) Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Tom Scales Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Pandionhalietius Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Barry B. Bean Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Bachofen Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, dreammoose RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, James N. McBride RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5? vs 650-1300/?, Tom RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5? vs 650-1300/?, James N. McBride Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, dreammoose Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Bruce Hamm <= RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, James N. McBride RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Daniel J. Mitchell Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Ken N RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Daniel J. Mitchell Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Hans van Veluwen RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, James N. McBride RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Daniel J. Mitchell

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, dreammoose
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] [OT] Bagpipes, Joel Wilcox
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, dreammoose
Next by Thread:	RE: [OM] 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, James N. McBride
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]