If the glass is toally clear with and the lens is
perfectly functional I would definitely go for it. I
personally have never used a 180/2.8 but it was
Olympus's fastest premier telephoto before the 180/2,
250/2, and 350/2.8 came out. If the Heliopan filter is
in good condition it alone is worth 15-30 dollars by
itself. A well brassed lens/body has a charm all its
own as long as it doesn't interfere or indicate real
damage.
Mark Lloyd
--- Michael Darling <cosmo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I need some advice...
>
> I've got the opportunity to pick up a MC 180/2.8 for
> $299 + tax. Glass is
> exceptionally clear and it comes w/heliopan UV
> filter. It's definitely in
> user condition showing a good amount of silver, but
> no dents or dings.
> Aperture is snappy and oil free. I'm all about
> buying gear to use, so
> that¹s not a problem for me.
>
> Considering KEH had a 'bargain' grade lens for ~$350
> not too long ago, I'm
> thinking this might be a good deal and I should jump
> on it.
>
> Only problem is I have this focal length covered
> with my 65-200/4. I also
> was planning on a beefier tripod before any more
> lenses. And then it was a
> showdown between the 180 and a 35/2.
>
> So should I jump in and get this lens? Is it a deal
> I'll be kicking myself
> for missing? Is the quality much better than the
> 65-200?
>
> Thanks for any 'help.'
>
> Mike
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing
> List >
> < For questions,
> mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page:
> http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|