Hi!
Is the quality of lens significantly better on Mju II or the differences
are not so big. As I said it is not for me, but for my girlfriend who usually
makes prints no bigger than 10 x 15 cm
Regards
Marcin
Bernd Moeller wrote:
> Hi Marcin,
>
> I've used the mju-I since 1992 partly as a backup on trips, partly because I
> had borrowed my only OM (an OM-10) to my sister. It died last year.
>
> I always liked the mju-I for its compactness and smooth operation. But after
> some years the self-timer died (no big problem). Then the meter went off (no
> slides anymore, but OK for prints) and finally it got a light leak (oh no!).
> Now it's buried in my cupboard and replaced by a mju-II. Some other users and
> a repairmen reported the self-timer issue also, and some said that the front
> cover sometimes gets stuck without the chance for economically feasible
> repair.
>
> I like the mju-II much better. It's even more compact, has a better lens,
> spot-metering and the price is just 15 USD more than the mju-I.
>
> Just my humble opinion
>
> Best regards
>
> Bernd Möller
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|