At 18:45 10/15/01, you wrote:
Does anyone know which of the 1.2 Zuikos were better than the other. I
have the opportunity to get either a 55mm 1.2 or the 50mm 1.2 (the 55
seems to be in better shape). I plan on using it for astrophotography, so
the 55 will likely be better as it has a larger light gathering
surface. Any insight (which one older, better coatings one one?
etc....) Also, which one may have better collectors value?
Thanks,
-Bill
Bill,
I've got a 50/1.2 and have used it for both general purpose photography and
for some experimenting with "star trail" type astrophotography. For
general purpose use, it has exceptional resolution, contrast, flare control
and decent bokeh. IMHO it's the best of all the Zuiko standard
lenses. Condition of the lens, especially the glass, obviously makes a
difference in performance.
The little bit of "star trail" type photos I did turned out quite
acceptable. I freely admit a lack of experience with star
photography. What was acceptable to me may not be to an experienced
astrophotography afficianado. I don't know as I've only used the 50/1.2
for this and have nothing with which I can compare its "star trail" images.
-- John
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|