>From what I've see on E-bay the 55mm is cheaper and
was made in greater numbers. The 50mm is the newer
version obviously and is somewhat more desireable
since it is still available new and takes 49mm filters
like a lot of Zuikos. I haven't had the chance to
experience the 50mm but the 55mm is a fine performer
even wide open and I would get that one if it is in
better shape, just remember that it should be less
expensive than the 50mm in similar condition. Be
careful though about the oldest versions since they
can yellow with age. I got one of the oldest versions
for like $50 from my camera store in near mint
condtion with the only problem being that I could only
use it for B&W the elements were so yellow it was like
using an orange filter. Still took great shots though.
Mark Lloyd
--- William Clark <wclark@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Does anyone know which of the 1.2 Zuikos were better
> than the other. I have
> the opportunity to get either a 55mm 1.2 or the 50mm
> 1.2 (the 55 seems to be
> in better shape). I plan on using it for
> astrophotography, so the 55 will
> likely be better as it has a larger light gathering
> surface. Any insight
> (which one older, better coatings one one? etc....)
> Also, which one may
> have better collectors value?
>
> Thanks,
> -Bill
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|