Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!

Subject: Re: [OM] OTF: Reliable? NOT!
From: Larry <Halpert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:54:14 -0400
But, it will work with it in the important functions that he was asking about.
So, he know's what he has, and has a problem, and any who thought he had
unmatched equipment were simply wrong. No big deal. Now, let's solve his
problem. I gave my suggestion. Any others?

Larry

DaEyeGuy@xxxxxxx wrote:

> in my records I have a writen timeline of my own from my old magazines, etc,
> and I have written down that both the T-32 and the Om2n were issued in 1979,
> vs. 1975 for the OM2.
>
> Susan Steele
> Virginia USA
> The best way to forget all your troubles is to wear tight shoes.
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz